Site icon The Electric

City approves $2.88 million in community ARPA grants

The Great Falls Civic Center. Photo by Jenn Rowell, The Electric

City Commissioners unanimously approved $2.88 million in community ARPA grants during their Dec. 6 meeting.

One person spoke in general opposition of the city’s use of federal COVID relief funds, but there was no other opposition to the staff recommendations and commissioners supported those recommendations as presented.

Commissioners initially reviewed the staff funding recommendations for community grants through the city’s American Rescue Plan Act allocation of COVID relief funds during a special Nov. 17 meeting.

Commissioners reviewing $2.88 million in community ARPA grant funding

During the Dec. 6 meeting, people from multiple grant awardees thanked the commission for the grants and the process.

The Great Falls Development Authority is not a recipient of the ARPA grants, but was previously awarded $1.4 million of CARES Act funds for their revolving loan fund, and they spoke in favor of the recommended ARPA grants.

Applications were due July 15 and the city received 34 applications that total $10,464,425.81.

City staff recommends $2.88 million in community ARPA grant funding

Tom Hazen, the city’s grant administrator, began reviewing the applications for completeness and eligibility over the summer.

Internal scoring of community ARPA grant applications underway

He told commissioners during their Sept. 6 meeting that eight applications were removed from consideration because they didn’t meet the minimum requirements under the city’s guidelines.

According to his presentation for the Nov.17 special meeting, 10 applications were deemed ineligible and were not scored.

The city received $19.47 million in ARPA funds, which are COVID relief funds. Those funds carry more detailed rules on eligible uses and deadlines for expenditure.

City beginning review of ARPA applications from community agencies

Hazen said that the internal staff committee began their review and evaluation of the remaining applications on Aug. 16 and is now recommending to commissioners to fund 14 projects totaling $2,884,557.

Once the committee ranked the project proposals, they started at the top and worked their way down until the $3 million cap was exhausted for their recommendation to the commission.

City caps ARPA funds at $3 million for community grants

In May, commissioners decided to cap the ARPA funds for community grants at $3 million.

Hazen said during the Nov. 17 meeting that the staff committee went against the scores in two instances.

In one case, NeighborWorks Great Falls had another application that scored well, but had already been recommended for funding for a separate program and if the agency was awarded both requests, it would have totaled about $1 million of the $3 million cap.

Hazen said the committee felt that was too great a concentration of funds into just one priority area so they bumped the second request for down payment assistance funds down in the rankings.

The second request that scored within the top 14 initially was from Habitat for Humanity but the amount would have put the total over the $3 million cap. Hazen said that they agency didn’t break down their budget in a way that the committee could see if partial funding would mean the project couldn’t be completed.

He said that United Way submitted multiple requests with detailed budget breakdowns and the committee determined that the request for an early education program met a priority and an area that the city has limited funding toward. He said that program would also be easier to administer and track under the funding rules so that program was bumped up in the rankings.

City considering improvements to GFPD, GFFR; public safety levy

The Tourism Business Improvement District’s request for funding for a tourism master plan was also bumped up since it was a good way of funding the tourism industry, which the city hadn’t done and would benefit the community at large, Hazen said.

The staff review committee used the scoring sheet that commissioners approved and was included in the application that was published in February.

Staff is recommending funding for the following projects, according to a Nov. 7 memo from Hazen to commissioners:

City finalizing plans for use of ARPA funds; beginning discussion of public safety levy

Hazen said that they used the raw scores to rank the funding requests, but also considered the priorities set by the commission at the beginning of the discussion on how to use the ARPA funds.

Commissioner Rick Tryon said during the Nov. 17 meeting that he wanted to ensure the process was transparent and said staff had done that.

He said he agreed with the commission priorities and the recommendations.

Tryon asked if they were doing the funding as a package or individually since the city realized its own ARPA projects have increasing costs.

City still working on plans for use of $19.47 million in ARPA funds; process for community grants

Deputy City Manager Chuck Anderson told him that it’s similar to the budget process when staff makes a recommendation but it’s up to the commission to make the decision on the funding and that it was the will of the sitting commission to set aside $3 million for the community grants.

Tryon said that the $3 million was the consensus at the time but asked how to have the discussion about adjusting that since the costs for city projects has increased.

City Commissioners deny Voyagers rent forgiveness request [2020]

During the Dec. 6 meeting, Tryon said that he was initially in favor of keeping all the ARPA money for city needs, but looking at the list of agencies that applied and that staff recommended for award, were “all good causes and I think they’ll all be beneficial to the community.”

Commissioner Joe McKenney asked about how the recommendation to fund the Great Falls Voyagers fit into the guidelines.

Hazen said that tourism was identified as a priority for ARPA funds by the city and the U.S. Department of Treasury, which set the rules for the funds.

He said that the stadium plays a big role in the community through the professional baseball team, as well as youth and community sports, tourism and entertainment.

According to their application, the stadium impacted about 100,000 per year, Hazen said.

He said there was some skepticism for that request by the committee initially, but that their application had demonstrated the damage COVID had done to the team and stadium and how the project would benefit the community.

Exit mobile version